In vitro study compares microleakage in fluoride releasing cements for bands in space maintainers, revealing implications for dental care.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the microleakage of three different types of luting cements for bands used in space maintainers. Methods: In total, 40 extracted primary human molars were used for the study and divided into four different groups: Group A: Control group, Group B: Conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), C: Light-cured resin cement, and Group D: Light-cured resin-reinforced GIC. The teeth were then demineralized in an acidic solution for 4 weeks and then submerged in a 10% solution of methylene blue for 24 h at 37°C. Following that, the teeth were buccolingually sectioned, and the depth of dye penetration was examined with an 80X stereomicroscope. Results: Post-hoc pairwise compressions showed a nonsignificant difference between light-cured resin cement and the control group ( P = 0.135). Conventional GIC and resin-reinforced GIC groups showed significant differences in the control group ( P < 0.001). The difference between conventional and resin-reinforced GIC was not significant ( P = 0.930). Conclusion: Resin-reinforced GIC exhibited the lowest potential for enamel demineralization, followed by conventional GIC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: