This analysis explores the collapse of ascetic ideals, suggesting implications for understanding meaningful values.
This contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium “The Satisfactions of Asceticism” offers an analysis of what Nietzsche calls “the ascetic ideal” along with two accounts of its demise. The analysis explains how ascetic ideals can be valued for their own sake, why they have an expressive character, and why their failure seems inconclusive. The standard account of the demise of the ascetic ideal posits that with time it becomes implausible, leaving room for a successor ideal to replace it. The more worrisome account of its demise is that since it is the only means of making sense of what counts as an ideal, its collapse leaves us with little hope for making sense of what matters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Guay (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: