Flume experiments compare sedimentary architecture in sand-rich and mud-rich deltas, indicating distinct depositional behaviors.
Existing studies have extensively investigated sand-rich shallow-water deltas. However, the sedimentary characteristics and internal architecture of mud-rich deltas remain poorly understood. In this study, two comparative flume experiments were conducted with sand–mud ratio as the key variable. High-resolution topographic data were acquired using a laser scanner to extract geometric parameters of the architectural elements. Three-dimensional architectural models were established and validated against the Ganjiang Delta (sand-rich) and the Ouchi River Delta (mud-rich) in China. The results reveal contrasting depositional styles: sand-rich deltas develop dense, laterally migrating braided channels with broad fan-shaped morphologies, forming blanket-like geometries that consist of vertically stacked and laterally amalgamated channel complexes with good connectivity; mud-rich deltas are characterized by stable channels with limited bifurcation, forming elongated finger-like morphologies with isolated, ribbon-like channel–mouth bar complexes that exhibit strong lateral heterogeneity and poor connectivity. These contrasting behaviors are governed by sediment cohesion: non-cohesive sands promote channel migration and dispersion, whereas cohesive silt and mud stabilize channels and focus sediment transport along main conduits. The experimental models successfully reproduce natural delta end-members, confirming the universal control of the sand–mud ratio. The established quantitative relationships provide a predictive basis for subsurface reservoir characterization and the formulation of differentiated development strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: