A retrospective study evaluates the efficacy and safety of aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular AMD, indicating positive outcomes for treatment duration and safety.
Background: Intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has improved outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but treatment burden remains substantial in real-world practice. High-dose aflibercept 8 mg was developed to extend dosing intervals; however, one-year real-world evidence in Japanese patients is limited. Objective: To evaluate one-year real-world efficacy, durability, and safety of aflibercept 8 mg for nAMD in Japan. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted across five institutions in Japan and included consecutive eyes with nAMD treated with aflibercept 8 mg between April and December 2024 and followed for at least 12 months. Visual acuity (VA; logMAR) and central subfield thickness (CST) were assessed at baseline and follow-up visits. Treatment followed an individualized treat-and-extend approach; 19, 1, and 20 eyes received 1, 2, and 3 loading injections, respectively. Durability was evaluated by comparing pre-switch and 12-month dosing intervals in eyes with paired data. Results: Forty eyes (36 patients) were analyzed: 35 previously treated eyes switched to aflibercept 8 mg and 5 treatment-naïve eyes. Median baseline VA was 0.155 logMAR and CST was 284 μm. VA at 12 months did not differ significantly from baseline (Hodges–Lehmann − 0.0395 logMAR; 95% CI, − 0.111 to 0.0141; p = 0.148), whereas CST decreased significantly (− 62.0 μm; 95% CI, − 106 to − 32.0; p = 0.000538). Among eyes with paired pre-switch interval data (n = 35), injection intervals increased from 8 weeks (IQR, 7– 12) to 12 weeks (IQR, 8– 14) at 12 months (median change +2 weeks; p = 0.00471). No ocular or systemic adverse events potentially related to aflibercept 8 mg were observed. Conclusion: In this Japanese real-world nAMD cohort, significant CST reduction was observed over 12 months, while visual acuity remained stable. Longer dosing intervals were also observed after switching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizuma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: