Qualitative research explores stroke survivors' views on stroke and physical therapy, highlighting rehabilitation implications.
The increasing prevalence of stroke in the community also increases the need for effective rehabilitation services. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of stroke survivors towards stroke and physical therapy may increase the effectiveness of personalized rehabilitation strategies. The aim of the study is to examine stroke patients' perceptions of stroke and physiotherapy. A qualitative research approach was adopted in the study. Fifty-six participants aged between 25 and 84 years were included in the study. The duration after stroke among participants ranged from 2 to 96 months. Interviews were conducted with participants to understand their experiences and perceptions related to stroke and physical therapy. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and main themes were identified. As a result of the data analysis, two main categories emerged: perception of stroke and perception of physical therapy. Four main themes were identified regarding stroke perception: physical limitations, pain and fatigue, psychosocial effects, and decrease in quality of life. Participants defined stroke as a condition that severely restricts mobility, increases dependency, and causes significant emotional and social difficulties. Four themes also emerged regarding physical therapy: health and recovery, return to daily life, functional improvement, and social support. Participants emphasized that physical therapy plays a critical role in increasing physical functionality, supporting independence, and improving general well-being. In conclusion, while individuals who have experienced stroke associate the condition with physical limitation, dependency, and psychosocial effects, they associate physical therapy with recovery, social interaction, motivation, and increased independence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Önal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: