This discourse analysis reveals how dating platforms legitimize infidelity in intimate relationships, suggesting broader implications for intimacy norms.
Infidelity in intimate relationships is widely perceived as “wrong” and related to relationship problems. At the same time, dedicated dating platforms are explicitly aimed at enabling and facilitating infidelity or affairs. Against this background, this study explores how five such platforms discursively legitimize infidelity. Based on a discourse analysis, I argue that infidelity is presented as a technology of (1) self-care, (2) relationship care, (3) belonging, (4) honesty, and (5) progressiveness. Through these framings, the platforms both draw upon and dissolve structural tensions of contemporary romantic love, intimacy, and relationships that individuals must navigate. By examining infidelity as a particularly contested object, I explore how the platform economy offers strategies for the legitimization and commodification of non-normative forms of intimacy and what these discursive formations reveal about the current intimacy zeitgeist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simone Schneider (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: