What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to examine how various jurisdictions address the crime of electronic defamation and its legal implications.

March 28, 2026Open Access

Electronic defamation crime (comparative study)

Key Points

The aim is to examine how various jurisdictions address the crime of electronic defamation and its legal implications.
Conducted a comparative analysis of legal frameworks regarding electronic defamation across different regions.
Reviewed legislative texts and court cases related to defamation.
Evaluated the effectiveness of penalties and compensation mechanisms.
Mapped key similarities and differences in defamation laws across various jurisdictions.
Identified a trend towards stricter penalties to deter electronic defamation.
Revealed that most jurisdictions require clear intent to prove defamation.

Abstract

15 ) - 2024 https://www.iasj.net/iasj/journal/132/issuesscholars have criminalized these acts.The crime of defamation is one of the crimes or one of those crimes that has a negative impact on the perpetrator.It is one of the crimes that is indecent and offensive to a person's honor and dignity.It is a complete crime like any other crime because it has its elements, which is represented by intent and is expressed in its basic element.Therefore, most legislation has implemented Working to criminalize such crimes and actions in order to reduce them, by directing the maximum penalties with imprisonment, as well as imposing financial compensation for him.The mechanism of proving them, whether audio or written, does not differ from mere proof, which falls on the perpetrator to limit these crimes and prevent the spread of such crimes and respect Others, so the legislator treated it with imprisonm.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anas Mahmood Khalaf (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c76fff8bbfbc51511e05b7 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63677/jqlap.2024.183579

Bookmark

View Full Paper