Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot trial demonstrates greater short-term benefit of De Gasquet method for pelvic floor issues in non-elite sports women, suggesting it may be more effective.
DGRT may provide greater short-term benefit for overall pelvic floor distress and anorectal symptoms than PFMT in non-elite sports women; urinary and quality-of-life findings are exploratory and require confirmation in adequately powered trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benedetto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: