Key result
TAVR in nonagenarians shows uncertain long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.
Why the study?
The role of TAVR in nonagenarians remains uncertain, particularly regarding long-term outcomes and prognostic factors such as frailty and malnutrition.
Does chronological age ≥90 years compared to <90 years worsen long-term mortality after transfemoral TAVR?
Cohort (n=4,623)
Yes
Does chronological age ≥90 years compared to <90 years worsen long-term mortality after transfemoral TAVR?
Absolute Event Rate: 53.2% vs 37%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In nonagenarians undergoing TAVR, excess long-term mortality is driven by noncardiovascular causes, emphasizing that frailty and malnutrition rather than chronological age should guide patient selection.
Warrants caution in TAVR for nonagenarians; leaves open long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.
BACKGROUND: The role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in nonagenarians remains uncertain, especially regarding long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of TAVR in nonagenarians, focusing on cause-specific mortality and the prognostic influence of frailty and malnutrition. METHODS: We analyzed 4,623 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR in a multicenter Japanese registry, including 700 aged ≥90 years. Outcomes were followed for 5 years. We analyzed all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, and the prognostic impact of the Clinical Frailty Scale and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index. RESULTS: At 5 years, all-cause mortality was higher in patients aged ≥90 years than in those <90 years (53.2% vs37.0%, P < 0.001), primarily due to noncardiovascular deaths such as senility and infections (32.5% vs 19.9%; P < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was similar (20.3% vs 17.0%; P = 0.198). Multivariable analysis showed that age ≥90 years was not an independent predictor; frailty and malnutrition were the strongest prognostic factors. A Clinical Frailty Scale-Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index heatmap revealed marked heterogeneity, identifying subgroups of nonagenarians with preserved nutrition and low frailty who achieved favorable long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicenter registry, excess mortality in nonagenarians after TAVR was driven mainly by noncardiovascular causes. Frailty and malnutrition, rather than chronological age, were central determinants of long-term outcomes. These findings emphasize that TAVR candidacy in nonagenarians should be guided on geriatric assessment of frailty and nutrition to identify patients most likely to achieve meaningful survival while avoiding futile interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis requiring TAVR (n=4,623). Age ≥90 years vs. Age <90 years was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=< 0.001). Age ≥90 years was associated with higher 5-year all-cause mortality after TAVR compared to age <90 years (53.2% vs 37.0%, P<0.001), primarily driven by noncardiovascular deaths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: