Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unbiased genome screening reveals genetic targets improving islet transplantation outcomes, suggesting functional potential in diabetes therapy.
Introduction Genetically engineering human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived islets is a promising strategy for improving transplantation for diabetes cell therapy; however, genetic perturbations that modulate transplantation outcomes have yet to be systematically explored. Methods To identify potential targets, we performed an unbiased whole-genome CRISPR-activation screen in transplanted stem cell–derived islets (SC-islets). Specifically, we created a stem cell line with CRISPR-activation components (HUES8-VPR) and then transduced these stem cells with a lentiviral guide RNA library targeting the whole human genome. Following transduction, the stem cells were differentiated into SC-islets, which were subsequently transplanted into NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) immunodeficient mice. After transplantation, SC-islets were extracted for next-generation sequencing. Results The screen identified multiple candidates, including the Fc alpha/mu receptor (FCAMR). In vitro characterization revealed that FCAMR overexpression did not negatively affect SC-islet function or transcriptomic identity. Mice subcutaneously transplanted with SC-islets overexpressing FCAMR had reduced blood glucose levels and increased C-peptide compared to controls. Additionally, mice receiving FCAMR-modified grafts into the kidney capsule or hindleg muscle maintained a higher body weight compared to controls in a diabetic setting. Conclusions In conclusion, this study demonstrats improved glucose regulation at a subcutaneous transplant site. In addition, we show that FCAMR SC-islets could play a role in systemic metabolism when transplanted into the kidney capsule or hindleg muscle. Overall, our study establishes a functional screening approach to identify gene candidates to improve SC-islet transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maestas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: