Systematic review finds L1CAM positivity linked to poorer survival in endometrial cancer across molecular subtypes, suggesting a need for further validation.
PURPOSE L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence of L1CAM expression across molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and its prognostic significance for survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies reporting L1CAM expression in endometrial cancer, stratified by molecular subtypes (polymerase epsilon [POLE], mismatch repair deficiency [MMR-D], no specific molecular profile [NSMP], p53 wild type [p53wt], p53 abnormal [p53abn]), and their association with survival outcomes were included. Pooled prevalence and hazard ratios with 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS Twenty-one retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of L1CAM positivity was 15%. Stratified by molecular subtype, prevalence was the lowest in POLE-mutated tumors (4.87%), followed by p53abn tumors (52.86%), MMR-D tumors (52.16%), NSMP (30.88%), and p53wt (25.99%). L1CAM positivity was significantly associated with worse disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.49 [95% CI, 1.75 to 3.55]) and progression-free survival (HR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.56 to 4.01]). Subgroup analyses revealed significant associations in MMR-D tumors (HR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.06 to 2.89]), NSMP tumors (HR, 5.41 [95% CI, 2.92 to 10.03]), and a borderline effect in p53abn tumors (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.00 to 2.85]). CONCLUSION The highest prevalence of L1CAM was found in p53abn endometrial tumors. L1CAM positivity is associated with poor survival outcomes, particularly in MMR-D and NSMP subgroups. These findings highlight the potential of L1CAM as a prognostic biomarker that could refine risk stratification and guide adjuvant management more accurately in endometrial cancer, warranting validation in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddiqui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: