Immunohistochemistry and genetic testing reveal unique patterns in neoplasms, suggesting new diagnostic insights.
Proliferative fasciitis (PFA) and proliferative myositis (PM) are related benign neoplasms that show large ganglion-like neoplastic cells and harbor recurrent FOS fusions. Proliferative funiculitis (PFU) is a benign mesenchymal lesion of the spermatic cord, with small ganglion-like cells and unknown etiology. Ischemic fasciitis (IFA) is a possibly reactive lesion that shows cytomorphologic overlap with PFA/PM. Here, we assessed FOS and FOSB immunohistochemistry (IHC) in PFA (adult and pediatric), PM, PFU, and IFA. Diffuse nuclear FOS expression was detected in adult PFA (15/26 cases; 58%) and PM (6/10; 60%), while FOSB was consistently negative (19 adult PFA, 5 PM). FOS FISH demonstrated rearrangement in only 4 of 12 tested adult PFA/PM, all of which were FOS-positive by IHC. A FOS fusion (FOS::TSHZ2) was detected in only 1 of 9 adult PFA/PM (11%) tested by RNA sequencing (RNAseq); 5 tumors without detected FOS fusions by RNAseq were FOS-positive by IHC. The pediatric PFA lacked expression of FOS (all 9 tumors) and FOSB (4 tested tumors) by IHC. Compared with FOS-positive PFA/PM, pediatric PFA and adult FOS-negative PFA/PM were more frequently cellular, and pediatric tumors were less infiltrative. DNA sequencing demonstrated FOSL1::RELA fusions in 2 of 5 tested pediatric PFAs, both in infants. Six of 18 PFU (33%) expressed FOS and/or FOSB by IHC. FISH demonstrated FOSB rearrangement in 1 of 6 PFU, while all 6 tested PFU were negative for FOS rearrangement. Nine of 20 IFA (45%) expressed FOS and/or FOSB; 2 tested tumors were negative for FOS or FOSB fusions by RNAseq. We conclude that about 60% of adult PFA/PM strongly express FOS, and 5 of these tumors were proven to harbor FOS rearrangements, including a novel FOS::TSHZ2 fusion. Some PFU and pediatric PFA harbored alterations in related genes FOSB and FOSL1, respectively. RNAseq and FISH might have imperfect sensitivity for FOS alterations in PFA/PM, likely due to the low relative neoplastic cell content in these tumor types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: