This research establishes the one-loop quantum field theory in gravitational settings, implying significant insights into quantum dynamics.
The complete one-loop quantum field theory of the Tikbon gravitational gauge field on S³ × ℝ is derived from the axioms of Quantum Geometrodynamics (QGD). Four results are established. Result 1 — Unitarity. The Ward–Takahashi identity is preserved at one loop. The curvature coupling γ A_μ A_ν G^μν contributes a momentum-independent constant to the vacuum polarisation. The contracted Bianchi identity ∇_μ G^μν = 0 ensures that this constant does not source longitudinal modes: the non-transverse contribution is absorbed into the background Einstein equation, leaving the propagating sector exactly transverse. The associated β-function contribution vanishes identically, because the composite-graviton structure of QGD (Paper V) requires a second Tikbon loop before G_μν can fluctuate at scale μ. Result 2 — Running of G. The exact one-loop beta function μ dg_T/dμ = n_f g_T³ / (12π²), n_f = 3 (Paper III), combined with G = g_T²/(4π), yields the running Newton constant G(μ) = G₀ / [1 − (n_f G₀)/(3π³ℏc) · (μ² − μ₀²)]. Result 3 — Self-consistent UV fixed point. The S³ momentum lattice imposes a physical UV cutoff μ* defined self-consistently by the condition G(μ*) μ²/(ℏc) = μ²/M_P²(μ*). The unique solution is μ* = √[π³/(π³ + n_f)] · M_P ≈ 0.984 M_P, with dimensionless coupling g̃* ≈ 0.968 < 1. The theory is perturbatively controlled up to and including the last physical mode. The Landau pole at μ_pole ≈ 5.6 M_P lies outside the physical spectrum and is therefore inaccessible. Result 4 — The ℏG constraint. The trade-off law R_g · r_c = ℓ_P², combined with the running of G(μ), imposes a renormalisation-group invariant: ℏ_eff(μ) · G(μ) = ℏ · G₀ = const. This is the quantum-level expression of the topological rigidity of the Planck area: ℓ_P² does not run. As G increases with μ, the effective action quantum decreases — the gravitational sector becomes more classical at higher energies, in direct inversion of the QED behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yunus Emre Tikbaş (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: