Systematic review assesses electric toothbrush vibration for accelerated tooth movement in orthodontics, indicating limited effectiveness.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of electric toothbrush-induced vibratory stimulation in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Methods: Following PROSPERO registration, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and grey literature sources up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing electric toothbrush-induced vibration with standard orthodontic treatment were included. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials involving 245 participants were included, with five eligible for meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of tooth movement between intervention and control groups (MD: 0.28 mm; 95% CI: −0.19 to 0.76; p = 0.24). High heterogeneity was noted (I 2 > 90%). Evidence certainty ranged from low to very low due to methodological limitations and outcome inconsistency. Conclusions: Current evidence does not support the use of electric toothbrush vibration as an effective adjunct for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sennimalai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: