PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Applied Sciences3 citationsOpen Access

Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Porous Metal Implants in Orthopedics: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Prospects

View Full Paper
CMConnor McCloskeyASAnoop SunkaraSKSiddhartha Kalala

Key Points

  • The review aims to explore the current applications and future prospects of patient-specific metal implants in orthopedics.
  • Summarized materials and manufacturing approaches for additively manufactured metal porous implants.
  • Discussed imaging and design workflows, lattice and pore architecture.
  • Reviewed the influence of the printing process on implant performance metrics.
  • Identified the potential benefits of patient-specific implants, such as improved osseointegration and biomechanics.
  • Highlighted challenges in adoption due to cost and clinical evidence compared to conventional implants.
  • Examined emerging trends like material innovation and cost-reduction efforts.

Abstract

Atypical joint spaces, such as those encountered in complex segmental bone loss and large structural defects, remain challenging to manage with conventional implants within divisions across orthopedics, including arthroplasty, tumor reconstruction, trauma, and spine. Additive manufacturing advances have made patient-specific implants a possibility, and this promising solution has enabled the creation of implants with customized geometry and controlled surface porosity to enhance osseointegration, reduce rejection rates, optimize biomechanics, and promote longevity. Despite its potential, patient-specific implants are still eclipsed in use by conventional, “off-the-shelf” implants due to their lower cost, documented long-term durability, insurance coverage, and the strength of available clinical evidence supporting their use. This narrative review summarizes current materials and manufacturing approaches for additively manufactured metal porous implants, including imaging and design workflows, lattice and pore architecture, and how the printing process influences implant stiffness, fatigue strength, surface roughness, and porosity. We also discuss the experimental and preclinical data on mechanical performance, fatigue resistance, and osseointegration for new developments in the field. Emerging trends such as material innovation, streamlined digital planning-to-implant workflows, 4D printing and other advanced additive manufacturing concepts, and cost-reduction efforts are examined in the context of clinical practicality. In this review, the integration of engineering principles with early clinical outcomes will provide orthopedic surgeons with a realistic understanding of the benefits and limitations of the future utilization of additive manufacturing in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCloskey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c772158bbfbc51511e2578https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073192
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper