PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review

View Full Paper
BLBruno LocatelliFBFelipe BenraLeuphana University of LüneburgDGDavide Geneletti

Key Points

  • To identify and analyze the different ways justice and ecosystem services (ES) are conceptualized in the literature.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 217 articles on ecosystem services and environmental justice.
  • Performed qualitative and quantitative analysis to discern different framings of the relationship.
  • Identified five distinct framings: Space, Access, Values, PES, and Management.
  • Five framings of the relationship between ecosystem services and justice were identified.
  • Each framing is linked to specific research questions and methodologies.
  • The analysis highlights gaps in understanding how justice is framed in relation to ecosystem services.

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) are integral to environmental justice, in particular because they unevenly contribute to the well-being of different communities. Effective ES management and governance can promote equitable access and ensure that marginalized groups are not excluded from ES benefits, while recognizing the interests of multiple stakeholders and fostering fair decision making. Although environmental justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions, most of the research on justice in ES has focused primarily on distributional aspects. Recent reviews indicate a growing interest in integrating environmental justice concerns with ES, but also highlight gaps in understanding how the relationship between justice and ES is framed and studied in different contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the predominant framings of the relationship between ES and justice. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 217 articles, examined from an environmental justice perspective, we identified five distinct framings, i.e. particular conceptualizations of the relationship between ES and justice that ultimately influence what (in)justices can be rendered visible or invisible. Each of the framings ‘Space’, ‘Access’, ‘Values’, ‘PES’ (Payment for ES), and ‘Management’ is associated with specific research questions and methods on ES, as well as specific perspectives and findings on justice. The plurality of framings identified in this review underscores the conceptual complexity of environmental justice and highlights the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives when addressing justice in relation to ES.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Locatelli et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c7724e8bbfbc51511e29efhttps://doi.org/10.48548/pubdata-3206
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field2024 · 27 citations
  2. 2Measuring environmental (in)justices: Insights from a systematic literature review on methodological approaches2025
  3. 3Justice in urban nature-based solutions: A systematic review of distributive, recognition, and procedural dimensions2026
  4. 4Environmental justice in ecosystem restoration frameworks2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Assessing environmental justice contributions in research and public policy: an applied framework and methodology2024 · 30 citations