Analysis reveals tremor control and gait outcomes in patients with deep brain stimulation, suggesting individualized risk prediction.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for medication-refractory essential tremor, yet clinical outcomes remain highly variable and stimulation-induced side effects, particularly gait ataxia, frequently limit long-term benefit. In routine clinical practice, it is difficult to predict which stimulation settings will provide optimal tremor control while avoiding disabling motor complications. We analysed long-term tremor and gait outcomes in 73 patients from two DBS centres with chronic bilateral (sub)thalamic DBS, assessed before surgery and at follow-up after 12 months using blinded ratings of standardized video recordings. We evaluated the influence of demographic, clinical, and stimulation parameters and applied voxel-wise probabilistic stimulation mapping to identify anatomical regions associated with tremor suppression and stimulation-induced gait ataxia. DBS produced a marked reduction in tremor (46.3% ± 4.3), with 77% of patients free of functionally disabling tremor (> 2 cm amplitude) at follow-up, but 44% exhibiting clinically relevant gait ataxia. No demographic, clinical, or stimulation parameter was independently associated with tremor improvement. However, probabilistic mapping revealed a tremor "sweet spot" just superior to the medial subthalamic nucleus, and stimulation field-based modelling predicted individual tremor outcome in leave-one-out cross-validation, explaining 21% of variance. In contrast, higher stimulation amplitudes and higher age at surgery were associated with greater stimulation-induced gait worsening, which localized to posterior-inferior stimulation in the subthalamic area. Integrating these factors enabled leave-one-out cross-validated prediction of gait outcome, explaining 49% of variance. Together, these results show that the clinical variability of DBS in essential tremor reflects both spatial targeting and patient-specific susceptibility. Individualized prediction models based on probabilistic stimulation mapping can integrate these factors to estimate stimulation outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weigl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: