Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines coastline counter-mapping, revealing ecological costs in urban environments, suggesting equitable futures.
This article examines how coastlines—a spatial and symbolic threshold between land and water—can reshape approaches to urban edge studies and counter-mapping. Building on critical, speculative, and deep mapping, the article proposes the coastline as an interdisciplinary marking system that intersects urban geography, data studies, and design. Drawing on examples from co-mapping workshops of Coastliner Lab, the practice led by the author, and the Istanbul Coastline Atlas, a public digital archive of lost and transformed coastlines, tracing coastlines reveals how wetlands, quays, streams, and basins have been buried, privatized, or reconfigured by large-scale infrastructural developments in the top-down urban regimes of the city. This method is argued to raise further questions about ecological costs and hydro-social relationships. The article argues that coastline counter-mapping is both diagnostic and generative, making environmental change visible while providing shared, geospatial tools for more equitable coastal futures in Istanbul and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gökçen Erkılıç (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: