This scoping review highlights AI and image analysis tools for assessing hair disorders, suggesting pathways for improved clinical use.
This scoping review summarizes current computational image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches for the assessment of hair and scalp disorders, with emphasis on quantitative trichoscopy and operator-independent evaluation. A deep Medline search was performed using a citation network-based approach using MeSH terms and complementary keywords covering diagnostic imaging, trichoscopy/videodermoscopy, image processing, algorithms, AI, and mobile/smartphone-based workflows. Overall, relatively few studies assess algorithms in real-world clinical pathways, and much of the retrieved literature is predominantly pre-clinical or methodology-driven. In parallel, commercially available AI-assisted trichoscopy platforms have little or no traceable peer-reviewed evidence; their validation methods and underlying datasets are often proprietary, undisclosed, and not directly comparable, limiting independent verification and cross-platform benchmarking. The most mature academic applications focus on follicular unit quantification (hair density, shaft diameter distribution, vellus-to-terminal ratio, and severity mapping), mainly using convolutional neural networks with object detection and instance segmentation. In conclusion, AI-assisted trichoscopy may support a shift toward standardized quantitative outputs, but clinical translation remains early and constrained by small or proprietary datasets, heterogeneous acquisition/annotation protocols, limited external validation, and scarce prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zengarini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: