A quasi-experimental study examines the effects of process-based instruction on writing skills in high school students, suggesting significant improvements.
This study aimed to examine students’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of process-based instruction in improving their paragraph writing skills. The study sought to determine the impact of the instruction on skill enhancement and students’ perceptions of its implementation. A quasi-experimental design was applied, as it was suitable for two intact classes to determine cause-effect relationship. From ten sections of grade ten, two were purposively selected: section 01 was randomly assigned to the experimental group and section 02 to the control group. A mixed-methods enhanced validity and reliability, including tests, questionnaires, and interviews. Tests assessed paragraph writing performance, while questionnaires with 40 students and interviews with 6 examined effectiveness. Quantitative data were analyzed using a t-test and descriptive statistics, and qualitative data thematically. Findings revealed that the experimental group outperformed control group, with statistical significance (t (39) = -3.750., p < .000) and a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.84). Process-based instruction also enhanced students’ interest in writing, encouraged feedback exchange, and promoted collaborative writing. The study improved students’ paragraph writing performance by emphasizing recurring practices, creativity, and peer-feedback. The study guided teachers to structure instructional phases, integrate related language skills, and apply continuous formative assessments, fostering social interaction, and gradual learning progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: