Cohort study analyzes late mortality effects of CMV/EBV reactivation in transplant recipients, suggesting extended PCR monitoring.
Background Whether simultaneous cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) reactivation confers additional late mortality beyond isolated CMV remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 202 consecutive first-ever hematopoietic stem cell transplantations performed between 2018 and 2019, using twice-weekly PCR surveillance and uniform preemptive therapy. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) at the 1-, 3-, and 5-year landmarks. Results Although 1-year outcomes were similar, divergence emerged thereafter: 5-year OS was 19.4% with coreactivation, 36.6% with isolated CMV, and 25.1% with no reactivation ( p = 0.041); corresponding LFS was 19.4%, 36.6%, and 25.2% ( p = 0.060). Multivariate analysis identified sustained CMV replication as the dominant late risk factor (OS HR 5.295, 95% CI 1.5888–17.6464; p = 0.0067), whereas coreactivation lost significance because EBV clearance shortened the overall viral window. Interestingly, viral enteritis was identified as an independent adverse predictor of 1-year LFS (HR 6.2453, 95% CI 1.3245–7.2376; p = 0.0010). Conclusions Late mortality is driven by persistent CMV-driven endothelial injury rather than transient EBV coreactivation. Extending PCR surveillance from day 100 to year 2 and targeting chronic low-level CMV should be prioritized to improve long-term transplantation success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: