Research demonstrates enhanced cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma using nanodiamond-conjugated siRNA with sorafenib, indicating a new treatment approach.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has poor prognosis due to its high resistance rates to chemotherapy. Myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL1), a potent anti-apoptotic regulator is emerging as a potential molecular target to overcome this resistance. Derived from its initial discovery in leukemia, the MCL1 oncoprotein is overexpressed in more than half of hepatic cancer cells. We developed a novel RNA interference (RNAi) strategy designed to suppress MCL1 oncogene in HCC by utilizing functionalized nanodiamonds (fNDs) as nucleic acid delivery vehicles. Two distinct amino acid-fNDs were engineered, forming diamoplexes (complexes with siRNA): HK-NDs (histidine was attached to all lysine residues on the ND surface), and H 50 K 50 -NDs (histidine was conjugated to 50% of surface lysine). Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were performed to map their intracellular fate in human HCC model (HepG2), confirming efficient cellular uptake and distribution. Metabolic activity-based cell viability assays analyzed via Combenefit software confirmed the synergy between anti-MCL1 siRNA diamoplexes and standard-of-care drug, sorafenib (an apoptotic-inducer). Cells exposed to diamoplexes led to MCL knockdown, thereby compromising their viability post-sorafenib treatment. Synergy was most significant (α < 0.05) between the lowest dose of sorafenib (0.525 μM) at all tested diamoplex concentrations (4.5 to 72 pmol). fNDs themselves demonstrated high biocompatibility (cell viability >70%), meeting the critical expectations of a safe gene delivery vector. Overall, this work provides a proof-of-concept for fND-based nucleic acid therapy. Platform's biosafety and high transfection efficiency is promising to augment treatment paradigm by combining gene and drug therapy, thus improving overall therapeutic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alwani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: