Demonstrates a hybrid approach enhancing gearbox fault diagnosis, improving robustness across varying conditions.
Gearbox fault diagnosis is critical for ensuring the reliability and safety of industrial rotating machinery operating under variable speed and load conditions. Traditional vibration-based diagnostic methods rely on handcrafted features and often suffer from reduced robustness when operating conditions change. This study proposes a unified hybrid framework that integrates physics-informed signal processing with a Cross-Scale Time–Frequency Transformer (CS-TFT) for robust gearbox fault diagnosis. Experiments are conducted on the PHM Society 2009 gearbox dataset, which comprises 560 multi-sensor vibration runs collected across five shaft speeds (30–50 Hz), two load levels, and multiple gear, bearing, and shaft fault types with multi-label annotations. Raw vibration signals are processed using tachometer-guided segmentation, time-synchronous averaging, and multi-resolution time–frequency representations, including the continuous wavelet transform, spectral kurtosis, and variational mode decomposition. The proposed CS-TFT is pre-trained using contrastive self-supervised learning and further enhanced with adversarial domain adaptation to improve generalization across unseen operating conditions. Performance is evaluated under a strict cross-speed testing protocol, where training and testing speeds are disjoint. Compared with classical machine learning models (Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost) and deep learning baselines (1D-CNN and CNN–LSTM), the proposed framework achieves a 40–60% reduction in Hamming loss and consistently higher macro- and micro-F1 scores on unseen speeds. Visualization and attention analyses further demonstrate that the model focuses on physically meaningful fault-related frequency components. These results indicate that the proposed hybrid transformer-based approach provides a robust and generalizable solution for practical gearbox condition monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhosle et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: