PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy2 citations

Steroid-Eluting Stents for Maintaining Frontal Sinus Patency After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
MAMeshal Saleem AlsaediHAHassan H. AlshurafaASAmal M Sunyur

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of steroid-eluting stents in maintaining patency of the frontal sinus ostium after endoscopic sinus surgery.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched databases including PubMed and Web of Science up to 2024.
  • Included 6 studies comprising 4 randomized controlled trials and 2 non-randomized studies.
  • Performed a meta-analysis using OpenMetaAnalyst to evaluate postoperative outcomes.
  • SES linked to a non-significant reduction in need for postoperative oral steroids (odds ratio: 0.58).
  • Pooled proportion of additional surgery needed was 6.9%.
  • Rate of FSO occlusion/restenosis was observed at 15.6%.
  • SES showed benefits compared to surgery alone but not when compared to steroid irrigations.

Abstract

Background Steroid-eluting stents (SES) are used alongside functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) to maintain sinus ostium patency and reduce Scar tissue formation and inflammation. Their effectiveness in minimizing oral steroid use and revision surgeries is debated. This review assesses the efficacy and safety of SES in maintaining patency of the frontal sinus ostium (FSO) and improving postoperative outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Methods This review followed PRISMA guidelines and searched multiple databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, for studies published up to 2024. It included 6 studies: 4 randomized controlled trials and 2 non-randomized studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using OpenMetaAnalyst to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Results Six studies involving 412 patients from the U.S. and China found that the use of SES was linked to a non-significant trend in reducing the need for postoperative oral steroids (odds ratio: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.32). The pooled proportion of patients needing additional surgery was 6.9% (95% CI: −0.1% to 13.8%, P = .052). The rate of FSO occlusion/restenosis was 15.6% (95% CI: 10.5% to 20.8%, P < .001). SES showed benefit in studies with control groups receiving surgery alone, but no benefit when compared to those receiving large-volume steroid irrigations. Conclusion SES effectively reduce inflammation and restenosis after surgery compared with surgery alone. However, their benefits may be limited to selected patients. Further studies on patient selection and cost-effectiveness will be required to guide future clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alsaedi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c1d7de0f0f753b39c104https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924261429546
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Drug-Eluting Bioabsorbable Stents in Rhinology: A Decadal Meta-Analysis2026
  2. 2Effectiveness Of Biodegradable Drug Eluting Frontal Sinus Stents as Adjuvant Therapy During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery2025
  3. 3Efficacy of Topical Corticosteroid Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Post-endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Narrative Synthesis of Randomized Controlled Trials2025
  4. 4SRS207 - The role of pre-operative systemic corticosteroids in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis2026
  5. 5THE IMPACT OF PREOPERATIVE STEROIDS ADMINISTRATION ON ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW2024