This review highlights lncRNA-derived peptides as potential neoantigens in low mutational burden tumors, suggesting novel therapeutic strategies.
Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the clinical management of several malignancies; however, its efficacy remains limited in tumors with low mutational burden and restricted availability of classical mutation-derived neoantigens. In this context, increasing evidence indicates that the tumor immunopeptidome extends far beyond canonical protein-coding regions, incorporating peptides derived from non-coding transcripts through non-canonical translation mechanisms. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), traditionally regarded as transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulators, have recently emerged as an unexpected source of small open reading frame-encoded peptides (lncPEPs). A subset of these peptides is processed and presented by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, generating tumor-specific neoantigens capable of eliciting CD8+ T cell responses. Owing to the high tissue and context specificity of lncRNA expression, lncRNA-derived neoantigens offer unique advantages over mutation-based targets, including increased tumor selectivity and potential recurrence across patient subsets. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on the biogenesis, detection, and immunogenic potential of lncRNA-derived peptides, highlighting experimental and computational strategies for their identification within the cancer immunopeptidome. We discuss the challenges associated with their validation and clinical translation, as well as their relevance for the development of vaccines and adoptive T cell–based therapies. Finally, we illustrate these concepts using epithelial ovarian cancer as a representative model of low-mutational-burden tumors, where lncRNA-derived neoantigens may help overcome current limitations of immunotherapy and enable patient stratification for personalized treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López-Calvo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: