Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares conventional and ohmic heating effects on bacterial inactivation and aflatoxin in sheep milk, suggesting improvements for food safety.
This study aimed to assess the impact of conventional heat processing (CH) at isothermal conditions (55, 60, 65, 70 or 73 °C) and ohmic heating processing (OH) at distinct electric field strength (3.33; 5.83; 8.33 V/cm) on L. monocytogenes and E. coli O157:H7 inactivation and aflatoxin M1 decontamination in sheep milk. The superior efficiency of OH over CH on bacteria inactivation was likely due to electroporation (OH × CH, p < 0.05). For example, OH treatments caused 7 log 10 CFU/mL reduction of E. coli O157:H7 after 30 min at 55 °C, while CH caused less than 5 log 10 CFU/mL reduction. Also, OH caused a 6 log 10 CFU/mL reduction of L. monocytogenes when conducted at 65 °C for 4.5 min, while CH caused a 5 log 10 CFU/mL reduction. L. monocytogenes was more resistant to heat and electrical current than E. coli O157:H7. CH and OH did not impact the aflatoxin concentration initially inoculated in sheep milk. Thus, this study showed the application of OH in different times/temperatures that could help the dairy industry develop protocols to enhance food safety, reducing processing time and energy consumption of sheep milk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balthazar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: