Population-based cohort study identifies high-volume hospital thresholds linked to lower mortality in cancer surgeries, suggesting better survival outcomes.
Background Increasing hospital operative volume is associated with improved outcomes in oesophagogastric cancer surgery, but definitions of ‘high-volume’ vary widely. This study examined the relationship between operative volume and 90-day mortality and examined whether a minimum threshold for a ‘high-volume’ unit could be defined. Methods Patients in England and Wales who underwent surgery with curative-intent for oesophagogastric cancer from 2016–2022 were identified using data from the National Oesophagogastric Cancer Audit. A multivariable restricted cubic spline model evaluated the relationship between hospital operative volume and adjusted 90-day mortality. A volume threshold was derived using a point of maximal change (PMC) method. Results Across 34 hospitals, 11 806 patients underwent surgery: 7905 for oesophageal and 3901 for gastric cancer. 76% were male, and the median age was 67 years-old (IQR 60–73). Overall, 376 patients (3.2%) died within 90 days of surgery. Median annual hospital volume was 65 cases (range 11–149). Increasing operative volume was associated with reduced adjusted 90-day mortality (P = 0.03). The PMC identified a threshold of 71 cases per year; 5368 (45.5%) patients underwent surgery at hospitals meeting this threshold. Treatment at high-volume hospitals (≥71 cases/year) was associated with significantly lower 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.75, 95% c.i. 0.60–0.92; P = 0.007). Conclusions Avoiding low hospital operative volume could improve short-term survival after oesophagogastric cancer surgery. A threshold of 71 cases per year appears to minimise the risk of postoperative mortality but fewer than a quarter of hospitals met this benchmark each year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Epton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: