Investigates adsorption techniques for recovering precious metals in wastewater using coal and coconut based activated carbons, suggesting effective recovery alternatives.
This study investigates the recovery of precious metals from wastewater generated by a precious metal refining plant using adsorption techniques with coal-based activated carbon (Coal-AC) and coconut-based activated carbon (Coconut-AC).The research focuses on the recovery of precious metals at varying pH levels and different dosages of activated carbon.Additionally, since non-precious metals (non-PMs) are also present in the wastewater, their removal was examined under the optimal conditions identified.The Coal-AC and Coconut-AC used in this study were characterized using SEM-EDX, FTIR, and BET analyses.Coconut-AC exhibited a higher carbon content but a lower oxygen content compared to Coal-AC.The highest adsorption of precious metals was observed at pH 3 for Coal-AC and pH 1 for Coconut-AC.Both adsorbents achieved maximum adsorption capacity at an activated carbon dosage of 6 g/L.Notably, Coal-AC demonstrated superior adsorption performance for precious metals compared to Coconut-AC.The determined adsorption capacities for silver (Ag), gold (Au), palladium (Pd), and platinum (Pt) using Coal-AC were 1.262 mg/g, 0.558 mg/g, 0.847 mg/g, and 1.235 mg/g, respectively.Consequently, the recovery of precious metals from effluent generated by precious metal refining plants through activated carbon through adsorption can be considered a viable alternative method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: