Implements and verifies composite number factorization, indicating consistency across classical and quantum platforms.
Based on the modular sieve method (8-orbit structure, logarithmic decay law) independently developed by the author, this paper implements composite number factorization on both classical computers and quantum simulators, and demon- strates that the results from both platforms are completely consistent. Classical verification was performed on a 2013 Mac Pro, where 9-digit composite numbers were factorized in an average of 5 seconds, and the Hardy–Littlewood conjecture was numerically verified up to 100 billion in 878.8 seconds. Quantum verifi- cation used a 20‐qubit circuit, successfully factorizing the composite number 1891 on pyqpanda in 18 seconds, with validation also performed on Qiskit. The two inde- pendent verifications corroborate each other, providing a solid empirical foundation for the correctness and lightweight nature of the modular sieve method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang Feiyue (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: