Meta-analysis reveals yield improvements and emission reductions in rice farming practices, suggesting climate-friendly solutions.
Feeding a growing population while mitigating climate change demands the transformation of rice systems, which sustain over half the global population yet contribute 50% of grain-related greenhouse gas emissions. We conducted a meta-analysis of 5322 field experiments from 504 peer-reviewed studies (1991–2024), employing Bayesian multivariate methods to model yield-emission trade-off across all production stages. Yield improvements generally outpace increases in emissions, thereby reducing greenhouse gas intensity. Key win-win practices include Dry-Direct-Seeding (13% emission reduction with yields comparable to transplanting), Alternate-Wetting-Drying (12% emission reduction, 4% yield increase), optimised nitrogen management (39% yield increase), and strategic residue removal. Practice effectiveness varies substantially by context: high-baseline environments (organic-rich soils, warm climates, wet seasons) emit 33–44% more greenhouse gases than low-baseline systems but produce similar yields, revealing mitigation opportunities. Context- tailored practice selection can reconcile food security with climate goals, though scaling up requires coordinated policy support addressing economic barriers and infrastructure constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: