Hydrogen is increasingly adopted as a clean energy carrier for storing and transporting low-carbon energy. Achieving a practical volumetric energy density for real-world deployment typically requires compression to several hundred bar, which in turn demands dedicated high-pressure infrastructure. Because valves are indispensable for isolation and flow control within this infrastructure, durable sealing valve materials become a key reliability and safety requirement. This assembly-level screening study compares two valve configurations with different polymer assemblies: EPDM O-rings with PEEK seats/bushing and NBR O-rings with POM seats/bushing. Four new identical 500-bar ball valves were tested (two EPDM/PEEK and two NBR/POM). For each seal configuration, one valve was cycled 5000 times at 500 bar in helium (inert baseline), and a second identical valve was cycled 5000 times at 500 bar in hydrogen to isolate hydrogen effects from mechanical/metallic wear. Leakage was tracked during cycling, and seals were analyzed by SEM/EDX after testing. The EPDM/PEEK configuration remained leak-tight in both gases, with no cracking observed in the elastomer or thermoplastic components. The NBR/POM configuration exhibited POM bushing fracture during cycling and minor external leakage at the stem during the hydrogen phase, accompanied by micro-fissures on the NBR O-ring surface. EDX indicated composition changes after cycling, including oxygen and fluorine enrichment and occasional metallic transfer species, consistent with surface films and deposits. Under the present valve geometry and cycling protocol, EPDM/PEEK provided robust sealing, whereas NBR/POM showed failure modes relevant to high-pressure service. These findings are intended as configuration-level screening evidence to be used in valves rather than as a full qualification of the individual materials.
Forte et al. (2026) studied this question.