Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative experimental investigation reveals hydrogen's impact on elastomer responses and degradation behavior.
Hydrogen-compatible elastomeric seals are critical for the reliability and safety of high-pressure hydrogen infrastructure. However, hydrogen exposure can alter the mechanical response and surface condition of elastomeric materials through coupled transport–mechanical interactions. This study presents a comparative experimental and data-driven investigation of the pressure-dependent degradation behavior of ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and fluorocarbon elastomer (FKM) O-ring seals following 192 h exposure to hydrogen pressures ranging from 800 to 7000 psi at room temperature. Tensile testing was performed directly on complete O-ring geometries, and descriptor-based analysis was used to quantify peak-response behavior, energy absorption, stiffness evolution, and normalized deformation characteristics. Multivariate statistical methods, principal component analysis (PCA), clustering analysis, and Random Forest regression were applied to identify material-specific degradation patterns. NBR maintained the highest overall load-bearing capability and stiffness-related response across the investigated pressure range, whereas EPDM exhibited more compliant and non-monotonic deformation behavior. FKM showed the strongest pressure sensitivity, with substantial increases in force- and stiffness-related descriptors at elevated hydrogen pressures. Optical image analysis revealed pronounced increases in defect density and defect area fraction for NBR, while FKM exhibited comparatively stable surface-state behavior. PCA and clustering analyses identified distinct material-dependent degradation trajectories, and Random Forest regression achieved an R2 value of 0.888 for energy-absorption prediction. The results demonstrate that hydrogen-induced degradation emerges through coupled interactions among stiffness evolution, deformation progression, energy absorption, and surface-state changes, providing a comparative framework for assessing elastomer performance in hydrogen environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: