PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026PLoS ONE3 citationsOpen Access

Geographical barriers and multimorbidity in quilombola territories of the amazon region

View Full Paper
LALeanna Silva AquinoESEllen Mara Fernandes da SilvaVAVictoria Valentim Aguiar

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the interaction between geographic barriers and multimorbidity in quilombola communities.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional epidemiological study with 518 adults from nine quilombola communities.
  • Mapped geographic coordinates of communities and health services to classify accessibility levels.
  • Utilized surveys to gather data on sociodemographics, disease prevalence, and service utilization.
  • Developed a Composite Access Index to assess health service access incorporating distance and service use.
  • Applied a Random Forest model to identify predictors of multimorbidity.
  • Territorial heterogeneity was observed among communities, influencing health service access.
  • Service utilization varied significantly, with reliance on care outside territories reaching 70-95%.
  • A majority (72.5%) reported complete resolution of health issues, with community variations.
  • The Composite Access Index revealed Ituqui, Tiningu, and Murumurutuba as the most vulnerable areas.
  • Hypertension, diabetes, and arthritis were identified as key predictors of multimorbidity with high model accuracy.

Abstract

Background Quilombola communities in the Brazilian Amazon face persistent social and territorial inequities that shape health outcomes and access to care. Geographic isolation, limited transportation, centralization of specialized services, and socioeconomic disadvantages contribute to unequal opportunities for timely diagnosis and treatment. Understanding how these determinants interact with patterns of multimorbidity is essential for guiding equiTable health policies and strengthening primary care in remote territories. Methods A cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted with 518 adults from nine quilombola communities in Santarém, Pará. Data were collected through household surveys addressing sociodemographics, self-reported diseases, service utilization and resolvability. Geographic coordinates of communities and health services were mapped to classify accessibility as high, medium or low. Diseases were converted into a binary matrix to estimate prevalence and identify multimorbidity (≥2 conditions). Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, ANOVA, Spearman correlations and heatmap visualization. A Composite Access Index (CAI) integrating geographic distance, epidemiological burden and service-use indicators was developed. A Random Forest model was used to identify conditions most strongly associated with multimorbidity. Results Communities showed marked territorial heterogeneity. Pérola do Maicá had the highest accessibility, while Ituqui, Tiningu and Murumuru presented substantial geographic and logistical barriers. Service utilization ranged from 42.9% to 95.0%, and most communities relied on care outside their territory (70–95%). Complete problem resolution was reported by 72.5% of participants, though with variation among communities. The CAI identified Ituqui (0.550), Tiningu (0.480) and Murumurutuba (0.331) as the most vulnerable territories. The Random Forest model achieved 93.6% accuracy, with hypertension, diabetes, musculoskeletal diseases, arthritis/rheumatism and heart disease emerging as key predictors of multimorbidity. Discussion Findings indicate that social and territorial determinants are strongly associated with inequities in access to health services, continuity of care, and disease burden across quilombola communities. Conclusions Geographic barriers and the distribution of health services are associated with distinct patterns of multimorbidity and health service access among quilombola populations. Strengthening primary care, transportation, and diagnostic support may help mitigate inequities and improve health conditions in remote Amazonian territories.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aquino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c336de0f0f753b39ddd6https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper