Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Integrating ecological metrics identifies sources and corridors in the Henan region, suggesting strategies for conservation.
As a novel approach to address the lack of systematic studies on spatial Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting and Ecological Security Pattern construction, this study integrates GEP thresholds with Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA) to identify ecological sources. A resistance surface is constructed using five representative influencing factors, and the Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) model is applied to extract ecological corridors, thereby establishing the Ecological Security Pattern for the Yellow River-Fronting Region of Henan in 2020. The results indicate the following: (1) GEP in the study area exhibits a spatial distribution of “high in the northwest, low in the southeast,” with regulating services accounting for more than 90% of the GEP. (2) A total of 11 ecological sources, 13 ecological corridors, and 7 ecological nodes were identified, primarily distributed in mountainous regions. (3) The Ecological Security Pattern exhibits spatial imbalance, with dense corridors in the western mountains and sparse distribution in the eastern plains. These findings provide scientific support for formulating ecological conservation measures and optimizing ecosystem management in the Yellow River Basin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: