Proposed approach detects label flipping in medical AI, improving model integrity with efficient review processes.
Medical AI pipelines face integrity risks from label flipping—mislabeling that harms thresholds, calibration, and parity. Because anomalies are rare, evolving, and often mislabeled, a purely supervised detector tends to miss new problems and flood reviewers with false alarms; a triage loop—rank strong model-vs-label disagreements, review a small top slice, fix, retrain—keeps effort low and results trustworthy. We present a lightweight procedure: basic plausibility/duplicate checks; leakage-safe K-fold cross-fitting; calibration; and Confident Learning to derive per-example flip scores (and the confident joint). High-scoring cases receive budgeted chart-review; we then selectively relabel or reweight, retrain, and recalibrate. We evaluate flip-ranking (PR-AUC, precision@k, TPR@low-FPR) and downstream AUROC/PR-AUC, ECE/Brier, and parity deltas. A HiRID ICU case demonstrates integrity and calibration gains with limited review effort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schönle et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: