Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomised trial shows systematic photo-documentation improves lesion detection in early surgical trainees, suggesting enhanced training quality.
Background Missed lesions account for up to 15% of post-OGD cancers. International societies advocate systematic photo-documentation, yet evidence remains low-quality and Irish KPIs require only two images (D2 and retroflexed fundus). Methods We conducted a randomised trial using the Simbionix GI Mentor™ simulator. Sixteen early surgical trainees (<50 OGDs in 15/16) were randomised to either: (i) control—Irish KPI protocol, or (ii) intervention—BSG 8-landmark photo-documentation. Each trainee completed 10 OGDs (5 normal, 5 pathology-positive). Outcomes were lesion detection, multi-lesion performance, procedure time, and adherence to photo-documentation. A baseline questionnaire assessed KPI knowledge and lesion-specific biopsy/reporting protocols. Results Across 80 pathology-positive cases, case-level detection was 80% in intervention versus 52% in control. In multi-lesion scenarios, ‘all-lesions-found’ (ALF) rates were 95% versus 25%, with control misses almost entirely due to non-imaged sites (incisura, antrum). Intervention trainees captured all landmarks in nearly every case; controls averaged 59% coverage. Recognition errors despite full coverage were rare (1 miss in 54 lesions). Procedure times were slightly longer in intervention (4:06 versus 3:26). Questionnaire data confirmed limited baseline knowledge: 31% correctly identified Irish KPIs, 12.5% knew the Prague system, 25% the Seattle protocol, and 6% the Sydney protocol. No control trainee reported prior awareness of the BSG 8-landmark standard, supporting absence of contamination. Conclusions Systematic 8-landmark photo-documentation substantially improves lesion detection, especially in multi-lesion cases, by eliminating coverage-driven misses. Recognition gaps remain a minority issue. These findings provide the first randomised evidence supporting photo-documentation as a quality metric in OGD training and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: