Evaluates the use of steel slag for paving to reduce carbon emissions in Xinjiang, suggesting environmental benefits.
The large-scale accumulation of steel slag from steelmaking and the over-exploitation of natural aggregates pose significant environmental and resource challenges. Focusing on the arid-cold region of Xinjiang, China, this study proposes the use of steel slag as a substitute for natural aggregates in pavement engineering. Through experimental performance evaluation and regionalized life cycle assessment (LCA), the technical feasibility and carbon reduction potential of this application were comprehensively evaluated. Results indicate that steel slag asphalt mixtures meet or exceed specification requirements in terms of high-temperature stability, water stability, and low-temperature crack resistance. However, volume stability decreases slightly with higher steel slag content and finer particle size, necessitating pretreatment for long-term durability. A local life cycle assessment model considering regional transportation factors was applied to the G30 Luhuo Expressway project. During the materialization stage, steel slag was used to replace 30% of the natural aggregates, reducing approximately 6718 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (31.4%). This, to some extent, reduced the extraction of natural resources, saved land resources, and alleviated the problems of resource shortage and price fluctuations. Sensitivity analysis reveals a positive correlation between carbon reduction and steel slag content, while transport distance strongly influences overall benefits, with a critical threshold of about 78 km defining the effective utilization range. Furthermore, a multi-objective optimization model balancing service life, cost, and carbon reduction was developed to identify an optimal steel slag content scheme, maximizing comprehensive benefits under constrained conditions. This work confirms the technical viability of steel slag pavement in extreme climates and provides a systematic framework integrating environmental benefits and logistical constraints, supporting regional industrial synergy and promoting circular economy practices in low-carbon infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: