Investigates flow-control strategies to enhance stability and performance of pumped-storage pump-turbines, suggesting improvements for design optimization.
The development of renewable energy and the increasing demand for electricity underscore the importance of pumped storage for grid stability. Under low-flow pump operating conditions, pump-turbines frequently exhibit hump characteristics, causing severe hydraulic instability and strong pressure pulsations. This study investigates the formation of a hump using full-channel numerical simulations based on the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model. The numerical flow–head characteristics were validated against the available experimental H–Q data, while the pressure pulsation results were used for qualitative mechanism analysis. The results reveal three major mechanisms: pre-swirl and spiral backflow in the draft tube, non-uniform runner inflow, and vortex flow-induced separation in the wicket gates. An analysis of entropy production reveals that vortex dissipation is responsible for as much as 71% of hydraulic losses in the hump region. In order to mitigate these effects, four stabilizing fins were installed inside the draft tube. The simulations indicate that the fins possess the capability to inhibit swirl and backflow, confine the vortices within the fin–runner interface, improve inflow uniformity and reduce overall hydraulic losses. As a result, the structural modification significantly attenuates the pressure pulsation amplitudes at key monitoring points and visibly shortens the recovery periods. The region of the hump and positive slope of the performance curve are considerably reduced while the head near the region of the hump is increased. Although the intrinsic hump characteristic is still present, the fin-based flow-control strategy can effectively improve the performance and stability of the pump-turbine, which can guide the design and optimization of high-efficiency pumped-storage plants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: