Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis reveals palm kernel cake inclusion shows no adverse effects on ruminant physiology and meat quality, suggesting market potential.
<ns7:p> Background The utilization of palm kernel cake (PKC) as a feed ingredient for ruminants has yielded inconsistent findings regarding its effects on animal physiology, feeding behavior, and meat quality. To address these discrepancies, a meta-analysis was conducted by synthesizing data from multiple studies that met specific inclusion criteria. Methods The analysis employed a mixed-model approach to evaluate the impact of PKC inclusion on nitrogen utilization, blood metabolites, feeding behavior, and the physicochemical properties of the <ns7:italic>Longissimus</ns7:italic> muscle in ruminants from 20 relevant articles. These articles originated from Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Springer Link using the keywords “palm kernel cake” and “ruminant.” The analysis was undertaken using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS® OnDemand for Academics. Results The findings indicate that increasing PKC levels had no significant effects on feeding behavior, nitrogen utilization, blood metabolism, or muscle physicochemical traits. However, a quadratic response (P<0.05) was observed for nitrogen excretion, absorbed nitrogen, and cholesterol levels, suggesting a threshold beyond which PKC inclusion may affect metabolic efficiency. Notably, PKC did not alter meat color, a crucial determinant of consumer preference, implying that its market acceptability remains unchanged. Conclusion PKC can be included as a sustainable protein and fiber source in ruminant diets without adversely affecting physiological responses and meat quality, although appropriate inclusion levels should be considered. </ns7:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fhonna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: