This intervention improved knowledge retention in embryology for first-year MBBS students, suggesting active methods boost teamwork and leadership skills.
Introduction: Embryology, a complex and three-dimensional (3D) field of anatomy, requires a multifaceted approach to learning. Traditional lectures often result in short-term retention, while visual aids such as videos can improve recall. However, creating models of embryological concepts and congenital anomalies facilitates a deeper understanding of the material. Building on this, the current study investigates the impact of combining two innovative methods – 3D model-making and jigsaw peer teaching – on both short-term and long-term knowledge retention in learning embryology. By engaging students actively and promoting peer-to-peer learning, this approach aims to enhance the learning experience and improve comprehension of this intricate subject. Materials and Methods: Sixty-two 1 st -year MBBS students learned systemic embryology topics and participated in a model-making competition, followed by jigsaw grouping. Short-term retention was assessed through pre- and posttests, analyzed using paired t -tests. Long-term retention was evaluated by correlating posttest scores with performance in the Common Internal Assessment Test (CIAT). Student feedback was also collected after the model-making and jigsaw activities. Results: The intervention yielded a significant 14.2-point increase in mean test scores ( P < 0.001). Posttest scores strongly correlated with scores in the CIAT ( r = 0.68) and embryology ( r = 0.62). Regression analysis confirmed a significant independent association between posttest scores and IA/embryology scores, controlling for confounding variables. Conclusion: Students found model-making and jigsaw learning to be valuable, time-consuming but effective methods for retaining long-term memory and learning embryology. Both approaches, being student-centered, fostered a dynamic learning environment, promoting teamwork, communication, leadership, and motivation, beyond just academic knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ragavan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: