Systematic review shows mixed evidence for Second Step social-emotional learning in elementary schools, indicating further research is needed.
In this systematic literature review we examined evidence for Second Step , a social-emotional learning curriculum implemented as a Tier 1 practice with elementary students. We applied Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education to evaluate if Second Step elementary could be considered an evidence-based practice. We found 37 studies meeting inclusion criteria, of which 13 met our weighted CEC quality indicator coding criterion (80%) to be considered methodologically sound. Following CEC guidelines, we classified three of 13 studies as having positive effects , while eight had neutral/mixed effects , and two were missing data preventing effect size calculation needed for classification. With three non-randomized group studies demonstrating positive effects and eight studies with neutral/mixed effects , the ratio of positive to neutral/mixed did not meet the minimum criterion of 3:1 or greater, so we placed Second Step elementary into CEC’s mixed evidence category of evidence-based classifications. We then discuss educational implications of these findings and future research directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Royer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: