Study finds relationships of hedonic hunger with intuitive eating in young adults, indicating physical activity has no effect.
Young adulthood is a critical developmental period characterized by significant physical, psychological, and social changes. During this stage, hedonic hunger refers to food consumption driven by emotional satisfaction, whereas intuitive eating reflects eating behaviors guided by internal hunger and satiety cues. Physical activity is also considered a potential factor influencing individuals’ food preferences. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the relationships between hedonic hunger, intuitive eating, and physical activity levels among young adults. The study was conducted using a relational screening model with a sample of 402 individuals (M = 19.02), aged 18–29, selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a personal information form, the Food Power Scale, the Intuitive Eating Scale, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 24.0, employing independent samples t-tests and Pearson correlation analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d, η²) and assumption checks were also considered to enhance interpretability. The findings indicated no significant differences in Food Power Scale total and sub-dimension scores or Intuitive Eating Scale sub-dimension scores based on gender (p > 0.05). However, significant relationships were found between participants’ BMI and both the total and sub-dimension scores of the Food Power Scale and Intuitive Eating Scale (p < 0.05). In contrast, no significant relationships were identified between physical activity levels and these scale scores (p > 0.05). In conclusion, BMI is significantly associated with food power perception and intuitive eating behaviors. These findings highlight the importance of providing educational interventions to promote healthy eating behaviors among young adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YAMANER et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: