Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Berk Baş; Ömer Küçükdemirci; Altay KANDEMİR; İsmail Taşkıran; Mehmet Hadi Yaşa; Halil Şahin; Müge Erdem Çağı

doi:10.47582/jompac.1865761

March 27, 2026Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care

Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This research compares the effects of Swift and Spray coagulation modes on outcomes during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Retrospective analysis of 594 patients undergoing colorectal ESD
Comparison of intraoperative and delayed bleeding, perforation rates, and adverse events
Patients were grouped by coagulation technique used during ESD
Procedure time was significantly shorter in the Spray coagulation group compared to the Swift group
Both groups exhibited comparable baseline characteristics
Overall adverse events were analyzed between the two coagulation modes

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Implication

Retrospective analysis compares clinical outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal ESD with Swift versus Spray coagulation, indicating differences in procedural bleeding control.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Baş et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c57ff8fdd13afe0bd5db https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1865761

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Key Points

No abstract yet

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Key Points

No abstract yet

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading