Analysis uncovers eye tracking identifies depression and suicidal ideation in young adults, highlighting attentional biases.
Objective biobehavioral markers for mental health conditions remain elusive, with diagnosis typically relying on self-reports and clinical interviews. We investigate eye tracking as a potential marker of attentional and mood biases associated with symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation from self-reported screening questionnaires. We analyze eye movements from 126 young adults during reading and responding to emotionally loaded sentences. A deep learning framework was designed to account for intra-trial and inter-trial variations in eye movements, achieving an AUC of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.766–0.819) for identifying depression/suicidality against healthy controls, and 0.826 (95% CI: 0.798–0.853) for suicidality specifically. The model also exhibited moderate accuracy in differentiating depressed from suicidal individuals (AUC: 0.609, 95% CI: 0.569–0.646). Discriminative patterns were more pronounced during response generation and for stimuli of negative sentiment. These findings suggest that eye tracking can provide objective markers of self-reported symptom severity by measuring the impact of emotional stimuli on oculomotor control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avramidis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: