⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

March 27, 2026Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care

Assessing the accuracy, safety, and clinical utility of AI-generated rehabilitation guidance for Bankart lesions: a blinded comparative evaluation with expert protocols

Alican Koluman Ahmet Yiğitbay E. Çiftçi Mehmet Utku Çiftçi Nezih Ziroğlu Cemal Kural

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This research evaluates the safety and accuracy of AI-generated rehabilitation guidance for Bankart lesions.
Blinded, cross-sectional comparative quality assessment conducted.
Standardized prompts were used to generate responses from ChatGPT-5.
Texts were compared with expert-developed protocols evaluated by three blinded experts.
Expert protocols scored significantly higher in clinical accuracy.
Safety concerns were raised about AI-generated guidelines.
Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Blinded evaluation of AI-generated guidelines versus expert protocols for Bankart lesions shows concerns about safety and accuracy.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Koluman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c57ff8fdd13afe0bd737 https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1884791

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Assessing the Efficacy of an AI-Powered Chatbot (ChatGPT) in Providing Information on Orthopedic Surgeries: A Comparative Study With Expert Opinion2024 · 10 citations
2AI vs AI: clinical reasoning performance of language models in orthopedic rehabilitation2025 · 2 citations
3Fabricated or accurate? Ethical concerns and citation hallucination in aI-generated scientific writing on musculoskeletal topics2025
4Artificial Intelligence in Patient EducationOriginal Research · 2026
5ChatGPT in Orthopedic Trauma: Consistency, Accuracy, and Agreement With Textbook and Expert OpinionOriginal Research · 2026

More related papers

Comparing the readability of AI-generated and society-authored patient information leaflets in orthopaedics2026
Comparative evaluation of traditional versus generative AI patient education material on prehabilitation2026
Evaluating AI‐Based Chatbots for Exercise and Rehabilitation Strategies in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Quality, Reliability Accuracy and Readability Analysis2026

More from Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care

Vitreous humor attenuation on computed tomography and its association with hypertension: a retrospective comparative studySat,
Association between temporomandibular disorders with anxiety and depression: a cross-sectional studySat,