Findings reveal increased mortgage denial rates by 0.49–0.81 pp as flood insurance lapses, suggesting lender responses to natural disasters.
Flooding is among the costliest natural disasters in many countries. To protect collateral, many mortgage borrowers in the United States are legally required to maintain flood insurance. However, lax enforcement leads to frequent policy lapses. This paper shows that lenders provide credit contingent on borrowers’ insurance incentives. Exploiting exogenous premium rises ($266 annually) that disincentivize insurance take-up, I find mortgage denial rates dramatically increase by 0.49–0.81 pp. By comparison, lowering income by $266 has an effect of only 0.01 pp. Mortgage applicants’ composition remains unchanged, refuting demand-side explanations. Evidence suggests lenders internalize ex-post monitoring costs into ex-ante credit restrictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhongchen Hu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: