PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026Aquaculture Research2 citationsOpen Access

Aquaculture‐Based Ecological Restoration: A Further Step of Regenerative and Restorative Aquaculture

View Full Paper
PAPaolo AlbiciniMFMaria Paola FerrantiVAValentina Asnaghi

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the role of aquaculture in ecological restoration processes.
  • Focused on integrating mariculture practices with ecological restoration strategies.
  • Analyzed integrated multi-trophic aquaculture and recirculating aquaculture systems.
  • Utilized recent case studies to support claims about restoration and biodiversity.
  • Shows how aquaculture can rehabilitate degraded habitats and restore ecosystem functions.
  • Finds that combining aquaculture with ecological strategies can enhance recovery of key species.
  • Indicates potential socioeconomic benefits arising from aquaculture-restoration integration.

Abstract

Aquaculture is increasingly recognized not only as a solution for global food security but also as a potential tool for ecological restoration. As marine biodiversity continues to face increasing threats and ongoing decline, there is a growing need to develop conservation‐oriented approaches, particularly within the aquaculture sector. This paper explores the integration of mariculture practices—such as integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture (IMTA) and recirculating aquaculture systems (RASs)—with ecological restoration strategies aimed at rehabilitating degraded habitats and restoring ecosystem functioning. But further, the paper introduces the potential of commercial aquaculture in supporting the cultivation of species of conservation interest alongside traditional commercial species (aquaculture‐assisted ecological restoration). We claim that combining commercial aquaculture with active restoration allows the scaling up of restoration efforts (i.e., one of the major bottlenecks at present), enhancing the recovery of key habitat‐forming organisms, such as seaweeds, seagrasses, and endangered invertebrates, while also generating socioeconomic benefits. Drawing from recent case studies, we propose the feasibility and advantages of a “reproduce to restore” paradigm. This approach positions aquaculture as a nature‐based solution capable of supporting biodiversity goals under international frameworks such as the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Albicini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c5a4f8fdd13afe0bd97ahttps://doi.org/10.1155/are/7884319
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fish restocking as a conservation strategy: Challenges and opportunities2026
  2. 2Shellfish reef aquaculture: a perspective on the systematic cultivation of endangered biogenic habitats2024
  3. 3Ecosystem importance of aquaculture2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Positive Influence of Bivalve Aquaculture on Epibenthic Macrofauna: An Example of Restorative Aquaculture in Coastal Ecosystems2025
  5. 5Positive Influence of Mussel Aquaculture on Epibenthic Macrofauna: An Example of Restorative Aquaculture in Coastal Ecosystems2026