PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Structural Projection Cosmology v1.0: Geometry–Growth Projection Test (GGPT) as a Falsifiable Alternative to Dark Energy

View Full Paper
KOKoji Okino

Key Points

  • The study aims to propose a framework that interprets cosmic acceleration as a projection effect rather than dark energy.
  • Introduced Structural Projection Cosmology (SPC) as a falsifiable model.
  • Developed the Geometry–Growth Projection Test (GGPT) to differentiate between projection and physical acceleration.
  • Used next-generation surveys like Euclid, DESI, and Roman for observational validation.
  • The model predicts systematic separation in the growth sector compared to ΛCDM.
  • If growth and geometry show no separation, the SPC model is ruled out.

Abstract

We present Structural Projection Cosmology (SPC), a minimal and explicitly falsifiable framework in which cosmic acceleration is interpreted as a projection effect rather than a physical dark-energy component. The model is constructed to remain observationally degenerate with ΛCDM in the background expansion history, while predicting a systematic and unavoidable separation in the growth sector. This leads to a decisive observational criterion: Geometry alone is not sufficient. Growth reveals the structure. We define this as the Geometry–Growth Projection Test (GGPT). The framework provides a direct observational pathway to distinguish projection from physical acceleration using next-generation surveys such as Euclid, DESI, and Roman. If no separation between geometry and growth is observed, the model is ruled out.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koji Okino (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c5c5f8fdd13afe0bdd71https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19276308
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper