Key result
Catheter ablation yields comparable arrhythmia recurrence in AF detected after stroke versus known AF.
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation provide comparable freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke compared to those with known atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=232)
No
Does catheter ablation provide comparable freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke compared to those with known atrial fibrillation?
Catheter ablation demonstrates comparable mid-term efficacy and safety for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke compared to those with previously known atrial fibrillation.
Supports consideration of ablation in AF detected after stroke; extends rhythm control evidence to this population and warrants randomized trials.
Background A subset of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) first present with ischemic stroke. After neurological recovery, catheter ablation (CA) may be considered in arrhythmia clinic. However, outcomes of CA in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke (AFDAS) remain insufficiently characterized compared with people with previously known AF (KAF). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation between January 2023 and October 2024 in a special arrhythmia ward. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Outcome analyses were restricted to the matched cohort. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia. The key secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, or cardiovascular rehospitalization. Results Among 3,417 eligible patients, 232 were included in the matched analysis (48 AFDAS, 184 KAF). AFDAS patients had numerically lower 2-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates [14.6% vs. 22.1%; HR 0.70, (95% CI 0.31–1.57); log-rank P = .39], although the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of the key secondary endpoint was also similar between groups [9.2% vs. 14.1%; HR 0.73, (95% CI 0.28–1.90); log-rank P = .52]. Conclusion In this propensity score-matched cohort, CA was associated with comparable efficacy and safety outcomes in AFDAS and KAF patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to further clarify long-term outcomes in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation detected after stroke (AFDAS) (n=232). Catheter ablation vs. Known atrial fibrillation (KAF) was evaluated on Atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.31-1.57, p=0.39). Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke yielded comparable 2-year arrhythmia recurrence rates (14.6%) to those with known atrial fibrillation (22.1%, HR 0.70).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Atrial fibrillationMore from SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología