Qualitative study examines HIV risk perception among women in Sierra Leone, highlighting prevention strategies and inequalities.
Women in Sierra Leone navigate HIV vulnerabilities shaped by gender inequities, economic dependence, and post-conflict dynamics. Despite a disproportionate burden (2.2% among women versus 1.1% among men), limited research has explored how women perceive and respond to HIV risk in low-prevalence West African settings. This qualitative study examined risk perception, vulnerability drivers, and prevention strategies through semi-structured interviews with 90 women across three districts (Western Area Urban, Bo, Kenema), including women living with HIV (n = 40), women with elevated vulnerability (n = 30), and community health workers (n = 20). Thematic analysis guided by the AIDS Risk Reduction Model identified three themes: barriers to risk recognition through psychological distancing and moral othering; factors influencing commitment, shaped by self-worth, relationship power, economic dependence, and solidarity networks; and prevention in practice, encompassing testing access, condom negotiation constraints, limited pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness, and substance use intersections. Psychological distancing appeared reinforced by low HIV visibility, with stronger distancing in Bo and Kenema than Freetown. Economic dependence emerged as a pervasive constraint across the risk navigation process. Findings suggest effective prevention may require addressing structural preconditions for protective action, with attention to district-level variation in HIV visibility and network dynamics. Further research is needed to test these implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikoona et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: